Project margin matches project effort
Time, expense, contractor cost, and revenue reconciled at the project level. No quarter-end "where did the margin go" forensic.
When utilisation reports are green and project margin isn't,
Coherence across people, projects, and clients is the work.
We deliver the operating layer that makes services firms scale — contractor portals, project profitability, client transparency.
Three tiers, kept coherent.
Time, expense, contractor cost, and revenue reconciled at the project level. No quarter-end "where did the margin go" forensic.
Project status, blockers, billable progress, client interactions in one place. No status-by-email-thread.
Finance and delivery agree on what's billable and what's been recovered. Realisation gap is visible, not buried.
Contractor portal, task assignment, restricted access, timesheet — same operating discipline as internal staff.
Every timesheet entry feeds project margin, billable-vs-non-billable, utilisation, realisation, and forecast. The system either treats time as the entity it is, or every report is approximate.
External engineers and contract consultants need portal access, scoped task visibility, timesheet entry, and restricted attachment/comment privileges. BowfinCAD is the named delivery for this pattern.
The system that tracks all four together produces real margin numbers; the system that tracks them separately produces three numbers nobody trusts.
What the client sees of the engagement is what they remember when renewal comes up.
IT firms serving healthcare clients can find themselves inside HIPAA-aligned operating expectations. Engineering firms serving regulated industries can inherit those compliance footprints. The operating layer is designed with that asymmetry in mind; the specifics are scoped per engagement.
Targeted Odoo customisations (sales workflow + weekly-email automation) for an IT/cybersecurity firm whose service offering spans Apple and Microsoft platforms — engagement scope per the client.
External contractor portal — task list, timesheet, restricted stages, scoped attachment and comment access. Engineering services delivery with contractor management baked in.
Full Odoo implementation: HubSpot CRM connector, appointment booking, custom theme, email rebrand. Lead → client → engagement lifecycle for a services business.
Detailed write-ups of delivered work in this industry.
Client: M6iT
Surgical Odoo customisations: sales-workflow refinements and weekly-email automation, scoped tightly to the actual operating need rather than a full implementation.
Read the case studyClient: The Booking Group
Custom Odoo booking management platform for Broadways touring booking agency. Tours, "wraps" (booking contracts), city-level scheduling with open/close dates, gross-potential tracking per city, full-week vs split-week department types, partner portal for venues, XLSX reporting.
Read the case studyClient: MovingTo
Relocation / immigration services operating stack: HubSpot integration, appointment booking, and a custom theme — three pieces behaving as one operating layer.
Read the case studySee all case studies across every industry, or talk to us about engagements in this space.
Odoo as the operating layer: time, expense, project, contractor, billing, client lifecycle.
Open ERP Systems →Contractor portals, client portals, engagement-specific dashboards, custom workflows that ship faster than waiting for SaaS PSA tools to add the feature.
Open Custom Applications →HubSpot CRM, Salesforce, Slack, Twilio, accounting hand-off. The integration spine for services firms.
Open Integrations & Data →Managed hosting through Deploy Monkey, audit-safe logging, access control. Especially relevant when client regulatory exposure inherits into the firm.
Open Cloud & DevOps →New services-firm operating layer rollout. 12 to 24 weeks delivery + 6 to 12 weeks stabilisation. Time, expense, contractor, and project margin go first.
Open Implementation →When the firm's competitive surface is the portal or the workflow (BowfinCAD's contractor portal is the proof point). Built bespoke, integrated.
Open Custom Applications →Once live, optimisation cadence: practice-area additions, contractor model refinements, client-portal updates.
Open Long-Term Support →A services-firm engagement is the right move when you operate a services firm with 10+ practitioners (internal or contractor), project profitability is a quarterly forensic instead of a real-time view, and leadership wants the operating layer to be competitive surface area, not just back-office.
It's too early when you're a solo or small-team services firm where a SaaS PSA tool fits, you want generic PSA software (off-the-shelf will be cheaper), or there's no internal owner for project-margin discipline.
We consolidate PSA-like workflows into Odoo when that's the right fit — typically when the firm wants time, project, contractor, billing, and portal living in one operating system rather than stitched across SaaS tools. When a SaaS PSA is working fine for the core, we deliver the bespoke pieces (contractor portal, client portal, custom workflow) that the PSA doesn't cover.
Yes. BowfinCAD is the named delivery — external contractor portal with task list, timesheet, restricted stage access, scoped attachment and comment privileges. Contractors operate as first-class delivery capacity, not a parallel system.
Time + expense + contractor cost + revenue reconciled at the project level. Practice-area and service-line rollups available. The firm reports project margin from the same source finance closes.
Yes. M6iT Consulting is the named delivery — NYC-based IT/cybersecurity firm with managed services across Apple and Microsoft platforms. Engagement scope is set per client; we don't claim a one-size IT-services template.
The services firm inherits its clients' regulatory exposure. We design the operating layer with the controls those exposures expect (audit logging, access control, encryption, role-based separation). Where the engagement requires HIPAA-aligned hosting and a Business Associate Agreement, that's scoped per engagement. Certification belongs to the operating entity; the controls are designed in.
No "we do PSA too" pitch. Services-firm-first.